E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW X5 vs 1999 Acura NSX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura NSX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

75.75–76.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X5SpecificationAcura NSX
BMWMakeAcura
X5ModelNSX
2000Model year1999
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

BMW X5SpecificationAcura NSX
8,3 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
215 km/hTop speed260 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2977 cc
231 HPPower255 HP
300 NmTorque284 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X5SpecificationAcura NSX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
92 ltFuel tank70 lt
17,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
12,7 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X5SpecificationAcura NSX
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X5SpecificationAcura NSX
4666 mmLength4425 mm
1872 mmWidth1810 mm
1717 mmHeight1175 mm
1990 KgWeight1410 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW X5 and 1999 Acura NSX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura NSX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2000 Nissan GloriaVS2000 BMW X5Nissan Gloria vs BMW X52000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVS2000 BMW X5SsangYong Chairman vs BMW X52000 and 2000 model years1999 Alpina D10VS2000 BMW X5Alpina D10 vs BMW X51999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVS2000 BMW X5Acura NSX vs BMW X51999 and 2000 model years1999 Nissan CimaVS2000 BMW X5Nissan Cima vs BMW X51999 and 2000 model years

Comments are loading…