DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 Toyota Opa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Opa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationToyota Opa
MGMakeToyota
ZTModelOpa
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationToyota Opa
12,2 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
160 HPPower136 HP
215 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationToyota Opa
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationToyota Opa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/45 R18Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationToyota Opa
4790 mmLength4250 mm
1780 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1530 mm
1505 KgWeight1210 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 Toyota Opa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Opa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…