2012 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 2.4 (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Toyota Matrix vs 2012 Jeep Compass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Jeep
Compass
Jeep Compass 2.2 CRD (163 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota MatrixSpecificationJeep Compass
ToyotaMakeJeep
MatrixModelCompass
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota MatrixSpecificationJeep Compass
—0–100 km/h10,90 s
0 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
160 HPPower163 HP
225 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota MatrixSpecificationJeep Compass
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota MatrixSpecificationJeep Compass
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R17
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota MatrixSpecificationJeep Compass
4394 mmLength4448 mm
1765 mmWidth1812 mm
1549 mmHeight1718 mm
—Weight1680 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2635 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Toyota Matrix and 2012 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…