2011 • Dodge
Journey
Dodge Journey 2.4 i 16V (170 Hp) 2011Overall Score68.25/100
2011 Dodge Journey vs 2012 Toyota Matrix Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 2.4 (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Dodge JourneySpecificationToyota Matrix
DodgeMakeToyota
JourneyModelMatrix
2011Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Dodge JourneySpecificationToyota Matrix
11,8 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2360 ccEngine displacement2362 cc
170 HPPower160 HP
220 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Dodge JourneySpecificationToyota Matrix
PetrolFuel typePetrol
77 ltFuel tank50 lt
13,0 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dodge JourneySpecificationToyota Matrix
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears—
225/65R16; 225/55R19Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Dodge JourneySpecificationToyota Matrix
4888 mmLength4394 mm
1878 mmWidth1765 mm
1691 mmHeight1549 mm
1805 KgWeight—
2890 mmWheelbase2601 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Dodge Journey and 2012 Toyota Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…