2012 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 2.4 (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Toyota Matrix vs 2011 Dodge Journey Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Dodge
Journey
Dodge Journey 2.4 i 16V (170 Hp) 2011Overall Score68.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota MatrixSpecificationDodge Journey
ToyotaMakeDodge
MatrixModelJourney
2012Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota MatrixSpecificationDodge Journey
—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement2360 cc
160 HPPower170 HP
225 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota MatrixSpecificationDodge Journey
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank77 lt
—Urban consumption13,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota MatrixSpecificationDodge Journey
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4
—Tyre size225/65R16; 225/55R19
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota MatrixSpecificationDodge Journey
4394 mmLength4888 mm
1765 mmWidth1878 mm
1549 mmHeight1691 mm
—Weight1805 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2890 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Toyota Matrix and 2011 Dodge Journey approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…