2010 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 2.4 (160 Hp) 2010Overall Score68.5/100
2010 Toyota Matrix vs 2010 Volvo S80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.4 D (175 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo S80
ToyotaMakeVolvo
MatrixModelS80
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo S80
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
160 HPPower175 HP
225 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo S80
4394 mmLength4851 mm
1765 mmWidth1861 mm
1549 mmHeight1493 mm
—Weight1647 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Toyota Matrix and 2010 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSDodge Journey vs Toyota Matrix2010 and 2010 model yearsVSVolvo S80 vs Toyota Matrix2010 and 2010 model yearsImage unavailableVSVolvo XC70 vs Toyota Matrix2010 and 2010 model years
VSOpel Movano vs Toyota Matrix2010 and 2010 model yearsImage unavailableVSHyundai Grandeur/Azera vs Toyota Matrix2010 and 2010 model yearsComments are loading…