DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo XC70 vs 2010 Toyota Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeToyota
XC70ModelMatrix
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2362 cc
175 HPPower160 HP
420 NmTorque225 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
YesABS—

Dimensions

4838 mmLength4394 mm
1861 mmWidth1765 mm
1604 mmHeight1549 mm
1742 KgWeight—
2815 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo XC70 and 2010 Toyota Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…