2003 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 1.8i 16V (132 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Toyota Matrix vs 2003 Audi A3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 1.8 20V (125 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
ToyotaMakeAudi
MatrixModelA3
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
—0–100 km/h9,7 s
200 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
132 HPPower125 HP
171 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
4350 mmLength4152 mm
1775 mmWidth1735 mm
1540 mmHeight1427 mm
1215 KgWeight1160 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2513 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Toyota Matrix and 2003 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…