2003 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 1.8 20V (125 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.5/100
2003 Audi A3 vs 2003 Toyota Matrix Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 1.8i 16V (132 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A3SpecificationToyota Matrix
AudiMakeToyota
A3ModelMatrix
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Audi A3SpecificationToyota Matrix
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
125 HPPower132 HP
173 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A3SpecificationToyota Matrix
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A3SpecificationToyota Matrix
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi A3SpecificationToyota Matrix
4152 mmLength4350 mm
1735 mmWidth1775 mm
1427 mmHeight1540 mm
1160 KgWeight1215 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Audi A3 and 2003 Toyota Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…