2003 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 1.8i 16V (124 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
2003 Toyota Matrix vs 2003 Audi A3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 1.9 TDI (105 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
ToyotaMakeAudi
MatrixModelA3
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
—0–100 km/h11,4 s
178 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
124 HPPower105 HP
161 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
4350 mmLength4203 mm
1775 mmWidth1765 mm
1540 mmHeight1421 mm
1215 KgWeight1295 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2578 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Toyota Matrix and 2003 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…