DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Dodge Neon vs 2003 Toyota Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeToyota
NeonModelMatrix
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
133 HPPower124 HP
177 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4430 mmLength4350 mm
1712 mmWidth1775 mm
1422 mmHeight1540 mm
1170 KgWeight1215 Kg
2667 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Dodge Neon and 2003 Toyota Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…