DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Toyota Matrix vs 2002 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeLand Rover
MatrixModelFreelander
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,4 s
178 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1950 cc
124 HPPower112 HP
161 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4368 mm
1775 mmWidth1809 mm
1540 mmHeight1708 mm
1215 KgWeight1565 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Toyota Matrix and 2002 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…