DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi RVR vs 2002 Toyota Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
RVRModelMatrix
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
150 HPPower124 HP
179 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/55 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4280 mmLength4350 mm
1695 mmWidth1775 mm
1650 mmHeight1540 mm
1380 KgWeight1215 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi RVR and 2002 Toyota Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…