2008 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 1.8 i 16V (183 Hp) 2008Overall Score71.5/100
2008 Toyota Matrix vs 2009 Audi A3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 1.4 TFSI (125 Hp) 2009Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
ToyotaMakeAudi
MatrixModelA3
2008Model year2009
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
—0–100 km/h9,4 s
220 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
183 HPPower125 HP
176 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
12 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota MatrixSpecificationAudi A3
4350 mmLength4238 mm
1775 mmWidth1765 mm
1540 mmHeight1421 mm
1270 KgWeight1245 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2578 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Toyota Matrix and 2009 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…