DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Seat Altea vs 2008 Toyota Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeToyota
AlteaModelMatrix
2008Model year2008
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
208 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
170 HPPower183 HP
350 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption12 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4325 mmLength4350 mm
1768 mmWidth1775 mm
1568 mmHeight1540 mm
1446 KgWeight1270 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Seat Altea and 2008 Toyota Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…