DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 80 vs 1990 Toyota MasterAce Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota MasterAce

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

54.25–54.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
80ModelMasterAce
1990Model year1990
SedanBody type—
5Seats—
4Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1975 cc
90 HPPower83 HP
150 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
5Gears—
175/70 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

4393 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1397 mmHeight—
1130 KgWeight—
2546 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 80 and 1990 Toyota MasterAce approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota MasterAce leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…