2004 • Toyota
Mark X
Toyota Mark X 2.5 i (200 Hp) 2004Overall Score68.5/100
2004 Toyota Mark X vs 2004 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.5 i V6 (167 Hp) 2004Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota Mark XSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
ToyotaMakeChevrolet
Mark XModelTracker
2004Model year2004
—Body typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
Toyota Mark XSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2492 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
200 HPPower167 HP
250 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota Mark XSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota Mark XSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears4
—Tyre size215/70 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota Mark XSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
—Length4059 mm
—Width1694 mm
—Height1689 mm
—Weight1335 Kg
—Wheelbase2479 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Toyota Mark X and 2004 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…