2004 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.5 i V6 (167 Hp) 2004Overall Score69.25/100
2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2004 Toyota Mark X Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Toyota
Mark X
Toyota Mark X 2.5 i (200 Hp) 2004Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chevrolet TrackerSpecificationToyota Mark X
ChevroletMakeToyota
TrackerModelMark X
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody type—
5Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Chevrolet TrackerSpecificationToyota Mark X
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2492 cc
167 HPPower200 HP
220 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Chevrolet TrackerSpecificationToyota Mark X
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank0 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Chevrolet TrackerSpecificationToyota Mark X
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
4Gears—
215/70 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Chevrolet TrackerSpecificationToyota Mark X
4059 mmLength—
1694 mmWidth—
1689 mmHeight—
1335 KgWeight—
2479 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Toyota Mark X approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…