DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Mark II vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Mark II

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeLand Rover
Mark IIModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2491 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
196 HPPower177 HP
255 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4775 mmLength4433 mm
1760 mmWidth1809 mm
1475 mmHeight1709 mm
1570 KgWeight1550 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Mark II and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Mark II leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…