DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Toyota Mark II Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Mark II

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
FreelanderModelMark II
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2491 cc
177 HPPower196 HP
240 NmTorque255 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4775 mm
1809 mmWidth1760 mm
1709 mmHeight1475 mm
1550 KgWeight1570 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Mark II leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…