DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Mark II vs 2004 Seat Altea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Mark II

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeSeat
Mark IIModelAltea
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,7 s
190 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
160 HPPower200 HP
200 NmTorque280 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
14 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4735 mmLength4280 mm
1760 mmWidth1768 mm
1460 mmHeight1568 mm
1380 KgWeight1446 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Mark II and 2004 Seat Altea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Mark II leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…