2004 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 2.0 TDI (140 Hp) 2004Overall Score69.75/100
2004 Audi A3 vs 2004 Toyota Mark II Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Toyota
Mark II
Toyota Mark II 2.0 i 24V (160 Hp) 2004Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Audi A3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
69.75–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A3SpecificationToyota Mark II
AudiMakeToyota
A3ModelMark II
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Audi A3SpecificationToyota Mark II
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
140 HPPower160 HP
320 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A3SpecificationToyota Mark II
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A3SpecificationToyota Mark II
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi A3SpecificationToyota Mark II
4203 mmLength4735 mm
1765 mmWidth1760 mm
1421 mmHeight1460 mm
1375 KgWeight1380 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2780 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Audi A3 and 2004 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…