DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Mark II vs 2004 Holden Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Mark II

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeHolden
Mark IIModelAstra
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
160 HPPower200 HP
200 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank52 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/80 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4735 mmLength4252 mm
1760 mmWidth1709 mm
1460 mmHeight1425 mm
1380 KgWeight1282 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2606 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Mark II and 2004 Holden Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Mark II leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…