DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Econoline vs 2002 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Land Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeToyota
EconolineModelLand Cruiser
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,6 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4192 ccEngine displacement4164 cc
193 HPPower204 HP
331 NmTorque430 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
132 ltFuel tank96 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size275/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5382 mmLength4940 mm
2014 mmWidth1940 mm
2050 mmHeight1880 mm
2370 KgWeight2650 Kg
3505 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Econoline and 2002 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Land Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…