2005 • Toyota
Land Cruiser
Toyota Land Cruiser 4.2 D (135 Hp) 2005Overall Score65.5/100
2005 Toyota Land Cruiser vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Holden
Commodore
Holden Commodore 3.8 i V6 (200 Hp) 2000Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Land Cruiser
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota Land CruiserSpecificationHolden Commodore
ToyotaMakeHolden
Land CruiserModelCommodore
2005Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
8Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota Land CruiserSpecificationHolden Commodore
—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4163 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
135 HPPower200 HP
280 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota Land CruiserSpecificationHolden Commodore
DieselFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota Land CruiserSpecificationHolden Commodore
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota Land CruiserSpecificationHolden Commodore
4890 mmLength4884 mm
1940 mmWidth1842 mm
1890 mmHeight1450 mm
—Weight1550 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2788 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Toyota Land Cruiser and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Land Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…