DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Holden UTE vs 2013 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden UTE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeToyota
UTEModelLand Cruiser
2013Model year2013
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
245 HPPower281 HP
330 NmTorque385 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank87 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5055 mmLength4780 mm
1899 mmWidth1885 mm
1497 mmHeight1845 mm
1697 KgWeight2900 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Holden UTE and 2013 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…