DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW X3 vs 2005 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationJaguar XJ
BMWMakeJaguar
X3ModelXJ
2004Model year2005
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationJaguar XJ
7,8 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
224 km/hTop speed233 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
231 HPPower238 HP
300 NmTorque293 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank85 lt
16,0 ltUrban consumption15,3 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4569 mmLength5090 mm
1853 mmWidth1860 mm
1674 mmHeight1448 mm
1835 KgWeight1545 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase3034 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW X3 and 2005 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…