DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jaguar XJ vs 2004 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationBMW X3
JaguarMakeBMW
XJModelX3
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationBMW X3
8,1 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
233 km/hTop speed224 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
238 HPPower231 HP
293 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationBMW X3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank67 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption16,0 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationBMW X3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/45 R17Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationBMW X3
5090 mmLength4569 mm
1860 mmWidth1853 mm
1448 mmHeight1674 mm
1545 KgWeight1835 Kg
3034 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jaguar XJ and 2004 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…