DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW X3 vs 2005 Jaguar X-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar X-type

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationJaguar X-type
BMWMakeJaguar
X3ModelX-type
2004Model year2005
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationJaguar X-type
7,8 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
224 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2968 cc
231 HPPower231 HP
300 NmTorque279 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationJaguar X-type
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank61 lt
16,0 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationJaguar X-type
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationJaguar X-type
4569 mmLength4672 mm
1853 mmWidth1789 mm
1674 mmHeight1430 mm
1835 KgWeight1570 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW X3 and 2005 Jaguar X-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar X-type leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…