DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Land Cruiser vs 2000 Saturn LW Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn LW

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeSaturn
Land CruiserModelLW
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
165 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2982 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
163 HPPower185 HP
343 NmTorque258 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
10,4 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/80 R16 STyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4305 mmLength4835 mm
1730 mmWidth1755 mm
1855 mmHeight1455 mm
1835 KgWeight1485 Kg
2365 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Land Cruiser and 2000 Saturn LW approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn LW leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…