E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW X3 vs 2004 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelS80
2004Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
7,9 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
210 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2783 cc
204 HPPower272 HP
410 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
235/55 R17Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
4569 mmLength4822 mm
1853 mmWidth1832 mm
1674 mmHeight1434 mm
1835 KgWeight1630 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2791 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW X3 and 2004 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2004 BMW Z3VS2004 BMW X3BMW Z3 vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model years2004 Alfa Romeo 156VS2004 BMW X3Alfa Romeo 156 vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model years2005 Citroen C5VS2004 BMW X3Citroen C5 vs BMW X32005 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVS2004 BMW X3SsangYong Chairman vs BMW X32005 and 2004 model years2004 Volvo S80VS2004 BMW X3Volvo S80 vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model years

Comments are loading…