DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 SsangYong Chairman vs 2004 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeBMW
ChairmanModelX3
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,9 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3199 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
220 HPPower204 HP
305 NmTorque410 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank67 lt
17,1 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
10,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5355 mmLength4569 mm
1825 mmWidth1853 mm
1475 mmHeight1674 mm
1750 KgWeight1835 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 SsangYong Chairman and 2004 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…