DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW X3 vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeAlfa Romeo
X3Model156
2003Model year2003
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
210 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3179 cc
204 HPPower250 HP
410 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank63 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption12,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size225/45 ZR 17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4569 mmLength4430 mm
1853 mmWidth1745 mm
1674 mmHeight1415 mm
1835 KgWeight1410 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW X3 and 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…