E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW X3 vs 2003 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelS80
2003Model year2003
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
8,9 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
208 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
192 HPPower210 HP
245 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption13 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
4569 mmLength4822 mm
1853 mmWidth1832 mm
1674 mmHeight1434 mm
1815 KgWeight1530 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2791 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW X3 and 2003 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2003 Volvo S60VS2003 BMW X3Volvo S60 vs BMW X32003 and 2003 model years2003 Volvo S80VS2003 BMW X3Volvo S80 vs BMW X32003 and 2003 model years2003 Volvo V70VS2003 BMW X3Volvo V70 vs BMW X32003 and 2003 model years2003 Kia OptimaVS2003 BMW X3Kia Optima vs BMW X32003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVS2003 BMW X3Hyundai Grandeur/Azera vs BMW X32003 and 2003 model years

Comments are loading…