DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW X3 vs 2003 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C70
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelC70
2003Model year2003
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C70
8,9 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
208 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2319 cc
192 HPPower245 HP
245 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank68 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C70
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C70
4569 mmLength4716 mm
1853 mmWidth1817 mm
1674 mmHeight1429 mm
1815 KgWeight1580 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW X3 and 2003 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…