E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 BMW X3 vs 2005 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelS80
2005Model year2005
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
198 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower163 HP
200 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
4569 mmLength4820 mm
1853 mmWidth1830 mm
1674 mmHeight1440 mm
1660 KgWeight1500 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 BMW X3 and 2005 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2005 Nissan AvenirVS2005 BMW X3Nissan Avenir vs BMW X32005 and 2005 model years2005 Nissan BluebirdVS2005 BMW X3Nissan Bluebird vs BMW X32005 and 2005 model years2005 Saab 9-3VS2005 BMW X3Saab 9-3 vs BMW X32005 and 2005 model years2005 Seat AlteaVS2005 BMW X3Seat Altea vs BMW X32005 and 2005 model years2005 Seat LeonVS2005 BMW X3Seat Leon vs BMW X32005 and 2005 model years

Comments are loading…