DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 BMW X3 vs 2005 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW X3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

68.25–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 6
BMWMakeMazda
X3Model6
2005Model year2005
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 6
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
198 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
200 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 6
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size205/55 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 6
4569 mmLength4710 mm
1853 mmWidth1780 mm
1674 mmHeight1480 mm
1660 KgWeight1520 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 BMW X3 and 2005 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW X3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…