DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 BMW X3 vs 2005 Acura RSX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura RSX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationAcura RSX
BMWMakeAcura
X3ModelRSX
2005Model year2005
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationAcura RSX
11,5 s0–100 km/h6,2 s
198 km/hTop speed218 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower212 HP
200 NmTorque194 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationAcura RSX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank50 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationAcura RSX
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationAcura RSX
4569 mmLength4374 mm
1853 mmWidth1725 mm
1674 mmHeight1400 mm
1660 KgWeight1310 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 BMW X3 and 2005 Acura RSX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura RSX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…