DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Toyota Highlander vs 2013 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Highlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
HighlanderModel6
2014Model year2013
SUVBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
180 km/hTop speed216 km/h
2672 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
188 HPPower180 HP
252 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/55 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4765 mm
1925 mmWidth1795 mm
1730 mmHeight1490 mm
1880 KgWeight1575 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Toyota Highlander and 2013 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Highlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…