DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 6 vs 2014 Toyota Highlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Highlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
6ModelHighlander
2013Model year2014
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
216 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2672 cc
180 HPPower188 HP
0 NmTorque252 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank72 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size245/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4865 mm
1795 mmWidth1925 mm
1490 mmHeight1730 mm
1575 KgWeight1880 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 6 and 2014 Toyota Highlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Highlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…