DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Toyota Harrier vs 2002 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Harrier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeHonda
HarrierModelSm-x
2002Model year2002
SUV, CrossoverBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2163 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
140 HPPower131 HP
195 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/70 R16 99STyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4575 mmLength3950 mm
1815 mmWidth1695 mm
1665 mmHeight1750 mm
1700 KgWeight1330 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Toyota Harrier and 2002 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…