DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Sm-x vs 2002 Toyota Harrier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Harrier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeToyota
Sm-xModelHarrier
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeSUV, Crossover
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement2163 cc
131 HPPower140 HP
186 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption10,0 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size215/70 R16 99S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4575 mm
1695 mmWidth1815 mm
1750 mmHeight1665 mm
1330 KgWeight1700 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Sm-x and 2002 Toyota Harrier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…