DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Toyota Funcargo vs 2001 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Funcargo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeCitroen
FuncargoModelXsara
2001Model year2001
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
175 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
106 HPPower101 HP
145 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank54 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14TTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3860 mmLength4167 mm
1660 mmWidth1698 mm
1680 mmHeight1405 mm
1075 KgWeight1070 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Toyota Funcargo and 2001 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…