DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Citroen Xsara vs 2001 Toyota Funcargo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Funcargo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeToyota
XsaraModelFuncargo
2001Model year2001
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,8 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
177 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
101 HPPower106 HP
153 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank45 lt
13 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength3860 mm
1698 mmWidth1660 mm
1405 mmHeight1680 mm
1070 KgWeight1075 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Citroen Xsara and 2001 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…