DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Funcargo vs 1999 Kia Avella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Funcargo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeKia
FuncargoModelAvella
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
175 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
106 HPPower105 HP
145 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3860 mmLength4165 mm
1660 mmWidth1665 mm
1680 mmHeight1450 mm
1075 KgWeight930 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Funcargo and 1999 Kia Avella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…