DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Kia Avella vs 2000 Toyota Funcargo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Funcargo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeToyota
AvellaModelFuncargo
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
183 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
105 HPPower106 HP
147 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4165 mmLength3860 mm
1665 mmWidth1660 mm
1450 mmHeight1680 mm
930 KgWeight1075 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Kia Avella and 2000 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…