2004 • Toyota
Funcargo
Toyota Funcargo 1.3i 16V (86 Hp) 2004Overall Score47.25/100
2004 Toyota Funcargo vs 2004 Fiat Panda Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Fiat
Panda
Fiat Panda 1.3 i 16V Multijet 4X4 (70 Hp) 2004Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Funcargo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota FuncargoSpecificationFiat Panda
ToyotaMakeFiat
FuncargoModelPanda
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota FuncargoSpecificationFiat Panda
11,9 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
165 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1251 cc
86 HPPower70 HP
124 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota FuncargoSpecificationFiat Panda
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank35 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota FuncargoSpecificationFiat Panda
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size155/80 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota FuncargoSpecificationFiat Panda
3890 mmLength3538 mm
1690 mmWidth1578 mm
1680 mmHeight1540 mm
1055 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase2299 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Toyota Funcargo and 2004 Fiat Panda approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…