2004 • Fiat
Panda
Fiat Panda 1.3 i 16V Multijet 4X4 (70 Hp) 2004Overall Score46.25/100
2004 Fiat Panda vs 2004 Toyota Funcargo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Toyota
Funcargo
Toyota Funcargo 1.3i 16V (86 Hp) 2004Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Funcargo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat PandaSpecificationToyota Funcargo
FiatMakeToyota
PandaModelFuncargo
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Fiat PandaSpecificationToyota Funcargo
16,0 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
155 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1251 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
70 HPPower86 HP
180 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat PandaSpecificationToyota Funcargo
DieselFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat PandaSpecificationToyota Funcargo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/80 R13Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat PandaSpecificationToyota Funcargo
3538 mmLength3890 mm
1578 mmWidth1690 mm
1540 mmHeight1680 mm
—Weight1055 Kg
2299 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Fiat Panda and 2004 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…