2002 • Toyota
Funcargo
Toyota Funcargo 1.3i 16V (86 Hp) 2002Overall Score47.25/100
2002 Toyota Funcargo vs 2002 Citroen Xsara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.4 HDi (68 Hp) 2002Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Funcargo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota FuncargoSpecificationCitroen Xsara
ToyotaMakeCitroen
FuncargoModelXsara
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota FuncargoSpecificationCitroen Xsara
11,9 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
165 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
86 HPPower68 HP
124 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota FuncargoSpecificationCitroen Xsara
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank54 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota FuncargoSpecificationCitroen Xsara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota FuncargoSpecificationCitroen Xsara
3890 mmLength4167 mm
1690 mmWidth1698 mm
1680 mmHeight1405 mm
1055 KgWeight1120 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Toyota Funcargo and 2002 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…