2002 • Ford
Fusion
Ford Fusion 1.4 TDCi (68 Hp) 2002Overall Score46.25/100
2002 Ford Fusion vs 2002 Toyota Funcargo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Toyota
Funcargo
Toyota Funcargo 1.3i 16V (86 Hp) 2002Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Funcargo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FusionSpecificationToyota Funcargo
FordMakeToyota
FusionModelFuncargo
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford FusionSpecificationToyota Funcargo
15,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
158 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
68 HPPower86 HP
160 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FusionSpecificationToyota Funcargo
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FusionSpecificationToyota Funcargo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FusionSpecificationToyota Funcargo
4020 mmLength3890 mm
1708 mmWidth1690 mm
1503 mmHeight1680 mm
1105 KgWeight1055 Kg
2488 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Fusion and 2002 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…